Tag Archives: John Adams

Choose Science

 “If you want to save your child from polio, you can pray or you can inoculate.  Choose science.”  — Carl Sagan, The Demon-Haunted World

Far be it for me to provide scientific illiterates like Donald Trump and Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. with an appreciation of vaccine science.  For them and their admirers, political commitments preclude an understanding of the human immune system, how vaccines work, and how scientists go about creating them and demonstrating their safety and efficacy.  So let’s take a different approach.  Let’s try to cultivate an appreciation of vaccine science that is strictly historical and begins with the Revolutionary War.  In this way, perhaps, vaccine skeptics can edge toward an appreciation of the foundational role of vaccination and its precursor, inoculation, to American greatness in the pre-Trump era.

_____________________

Dear Anti-Vaxxers:

Did you know that at the outset of the Revolutionary War,  inoculation against smallpox – the insertion of  pus from the scabs and pustules of smallpox sufferers into arms of healthy soldiers to induce typically mild attacks of smallpox – was a crucial instrument of strategic advantage for British and Continental forces alike?  When inoculated British troops came into contact with healthy Continental soldiers and noncombatants, that is, the latter frequently contracted smallpox in its unattenuated, occasionally lethal form.  The only defense against disablement-by-smallpox, it turned out, was inoculation, since inoculated soldiers and civilians, after recovery, were immunized against smallpox in both its deadly and attenuated forms.

Did you know that when George Washington realized that overcoming smallpox was crucial to winning the War of  Independence, he indeed mandated the inoculation of the entire Continental Army?   His order of 5 February 1777 also sent a clear message to all 13 colonies:  American governments – local, state, and national – were obligated to “protect public health by providing broad access to inoculation.”[1]

Did you know that when Benjamin Waterhouse began shipping  Edward Jenner’s smallpox vaccine to America in 1800, George Washington, John Adams, and Thomas Jefferson hailed it as the greatest discovery of modern medicine?  When Jefferson became president in 1801, he pledged to introduce the vaccine to the American public because “it will be a great service indeed rendered to human nature to strike off the catalogue of its evils so great a one as the smallpox.”

Did you know that Jefferson’s successor, James Madison, signed into law in 1813 “An Act to Encourage Vaccination”?  And did you know that among its provisions was the requirement that the U.S. postal service “carry mail containing vaccine materials free of charge.[2]

Did you know that during the Civil War, Union and Confederate Armies were so desperate to vaccinate their troops against smallpox that they had their doctors cooperate in harvesting “vaccine matter” from the lymph of heathy children and infants, especially the offspring of the formerly enslaved?[3]

Did you know that when the Civil War ended, doctors from North and South joined forces to achieve a better understanding of smallpox vaccination methods?[4]  They believed an epidemiological understanding of effective vaccination was a shared mission in the service of the re-united nation.

Did you know that in 1893 New York State legislators passed a law requiring public schools to deny enrollment to any child who could not present proof of vaccination, and that the law was extended to private and parochial schools via the Jones-Tallett amendment of 1915?[5]  And did you know that the legislators’ commitment to vaccination for all children was reaffirmed a half century later, when Title XIX of the Social Security Act of 1965 mandated “the right of every American child to receive comprehensive pediatric care, including vaccinations.”[6]

Two 13-year-old classmates exposed to the same strain of smallpox at the same time in their classroom in Leicester, England in 1901. One was vaccinated against smallpox in infancy. The other was not.

Did you know that throughout the 19th century, diphtheria was “the dreaded killer that stalked young children”?[7]   It was an  upper-respiratory inflammation of such severity that it gave rise to a  “pseudomembrane” that covered the pharynx and larynx and led to death by  asphyxiation.    Then, in the early 1890s, Emile Roux and his team at the Pasteur Institute discovered that horses not only withstood repeated inoculation with live diphtheria bacteria, but their blood, purified into an injectable serum, both restored infected children (and adults) to health and provided healthy kids with short-term immunity.  No sooner did the serum become commercially available in 1895 than the U.S. death rate among hospitalized diphtheria patients was cut in half  – an astonishing fact for the time.  By 1913, when the “Shick test” permitted on-the-spot testing for diphtheria, public health nurses and doctors discovered that 30% of NYC school children tested positive for the disease.  Injections of serum saved the vast majority and immunized their healthy classmates.  New York’s program of diphtheria immunization was copied by municipalities throughout the country. In the early 1930s, diphtheria serum gave way to a long-lasting toxoid vaccine, and in the 1940s, given in combination with pertussis and tetanus vaccines (DBT), diphtheria, “the plague among children” (Noah Webster), became a horror of the past.

A ghostly Skeleton, representing diphtheria, reaches out to strangle a sick child. Watercolor by Richard Tennant Cooper (1885–1957), commissioned by Henry S. Wellcome c. 1912 and now in the Wellcome Collection

Did you know that in Jacobson v. Massachusetts, a landmark decision of 1905, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the constitutionality of compulsory vaccination laws? And then, in 1922, in Zucht v. King, the Court stated that “no constitutional right was infringed by excluding unvaccinated children from school.”  The decision was written by Louis Brandeis.[8]

Did you know that in 1909 the U.S. Army made typhoid vaccination compulsory for all soldiers, and the requirement reduced the typhoid rate among troops from 243 per 100,000 in 1909 to 4.4 per 100,000 in three years?[9]  When America entered WWI in 1917, troops sailing to France had to be vaccinated.  Those who had not received their shots stateside received them on arriving at their camps.  Vaccination was not negotiable.  The obligation to live and fight for the nation trumped the freedom to contract typhoid, suffer, and possibly die.

Did you know that in the mid-1950s, when Cold War tensions peaked, mass polio vaccination was such a global imperative that it brought together the United States and Soviet Union?   In 1956, with the KGB in tow, two leading Russian virologists journeyed to Albert Sabin’s laboratory in Cincinnati Children’s Hospital, while Sabin in turn flew to Moscow to continue the brainstorming.  The short-term result was mass trials that confirmed with finality the safety and efficacy of the Sabin vaccine, while bringing its benefits to 10 million Russian school children and several million young Russian adults.[10]  The long-term result was the Global Polio Eradication Initiative that began in 1988 and eradicated polio transmission everywhere in the world except Afghanistan and Pakistan.

Did you know that following the development of a freeze-dried smallpox vaccine by Soviet scientists in 1958, Soviet Deputy Health Minister Viktor  Zhdanov and American public health epidemiologist Donald Henderson jointly waged a 10-year international campaign to raise enough money to make the vaccine available world-wide?[11]  The result of their campaign, in partnership with WHO, was the elimination of smallpox by 1977.[12]

Did you know that in 1963 a severe outbreak of rubella (German measles) led the U.S. Congress to approve the “Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment” amendments to Title XIX of the Social Security Act of 1965?  The amendments mandated the right of every American child to comprehensive pediatric care, including vaccinations.[13]

___________________

Now, in 2025, a segment of the population has reclaimed the mindset of antebellum America, when the Founding Fathers’ belief that medical progress safeguarded democracy gave way to something far less enlightened: the belief that everyone can be his or her own doctor.  Sadly, what the historian Joseph Kett termed the Dark Age of American medicine[14] has been revived among those newly skeptical of vaccination, and especially resistant to compulsory vaccination of children.  In its place, they proffer a contemporary variant of the anti-elitist cry of the Jacksonian era:  Every man his own doctor; every man his own remedies.  Transposed to the early 20th century, the Jacksonian cry resurfaced as resistance to smallpox vaccination.  To the anti-vaxxers of the time, the vaccine that, in its inoculatory form, helped win the Revolutionary War, was state-sanctioned trespassing on a person’s body.[15]  Now, in the wake of the coronavirus pandemic of 2020, the body has been politicized yet again.

In the case of President Donald Trump and Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert Kennedy, Jr., scientific ignorance of breathtaking proportions carries the prescientific regression back to ancient times.  When Plague, in the form of coronavirus, returned to America in 2020, legions of Trump followers followed the lead of a president whose understanding of viral infection followed the Galenic belief that whole-body states require whole-body remedies.  Disinfectants like Chlorox, he announced to the nation, kill microbes when we wipe our countertops with it.  Why then, he mused, can’t we destroy the coronavirus by injecting bleach into our veins?  What bleach does to healthy tissue, blood chemistry, and internal organs – these are questions an inquiring 8th grader might ask her teacher.  But they could not occur to a medieval physician or a boastfully ignorant President.  In Trump-world, as I observed elsewhere,[16] “there is no possibility of weighing the pros and cons of specific treatments for specific ailments (read: different types of infection, local and systemic).  The concept of immunological specificity is literally unthinkable.”  As to ingestion of hydroxychloroquine tablets, another touted Trump remedy for coronavirus, “More Deaths, No Benefit” begins the VA Virus Study reporting on Trump’s preferred Covid-19 treatment put forth by Trump.[17]

Trump’s HSS Secretary, Robert Kennedy, Jr. would not be among the inquiring 8th graders.  When coronavirus reached America, Trump at least followed a medieval script.  Kennedy Jr., encased in two decades of anti-vaccine claptrap, did not need a script. He simply absorbed coronavirus into an ongoing narrative of fabrication, misinformation, and bizarre conspiracy theories calculated to scare people away from vaccination.

As HHS Secretary, Kennedy Jr.’s mission has been to complexify access to coronavirus vaccines.  Most recently, he directed the CDC to rescind its recommendation of Covid-19 vaccination for pregnant women and healthy young children.  The triumph of scientists in creating safe genetic RNA vaccines could not dislodge the medieval mindset and paranoid delusions that have long been his stock in trade.  No, Mr. Secretary, Covid-19 was not engineered to attack Caucasians and African Americans while sparing Ashkenazi Jews and the Chinese.  No, Covid-19 vaccines were not created to effect governmental control via implanted microchips.  No, vaccines do not cause autism.  No, Wi-Fi is not linked to cancer.  No, anti-depressants do not lead to school shootings.  No, pharmaceutical firms are not conspiring to poison children to make money.

During the Black Death, 14th-century Flagellants roamed the streets of continental Europe, whipping themselves in a frenzy of self-mutilation that left them lacerated if not dead.  Their goal was to placate a wrathful God who had breathed down, literally, the poisonous vapors of Plague.  What they did, in fact, was leave behind an infectious stew of blood, tissue, and entrails that brought Plague to local villagers.   Kennedy, Jr. speaks out and showers listeners with verbal effluvia that induces them to forego vaccination and other scientifically grounded safeguards against disease.   Health-wise, he is a Flagellant,  spewing forth misinformation that puts listeners and their children at heightened risk for Covid-19 and  a cluster of infectious diseases long vanquished by vaccine science.

Does Kennedy, Jr. really believe that everything we have learned about the human immune system since the late 18th century is bogus, and that children who once died from smallpox, cholera, yellow fever, diphtheria, pertussis, typhoid, typhus, tetanus, and polio are still dying in droves, now from the vaccines they receive to protect them?   Does he believe the increase in life expectancy in the U.S. from 47 in 1900 to 77 in 2021 has nothing to do with vaccination?   Does he believe that the elimination of smallpox and polio from North America has nothing to do with vaccination?   Does he believe it a fluke of nature that the last yellow fever epidemic in America was in 1905, and that typhoid fever and diphtheria now victimize only unvaccinated American travelers who contract them abroad?

The fact that we have a President comfortably at home in the Galenic world, and an HSS Secretary whose web of delusional beliefs land him in the nether region of the Twilight Zone doesn’t mean the rest of us must follow suit.   We are citizens of the 21st century and entitled to reap the life-sustaining benefits of 250 years of sustained medical progress – progress that has taken us to the doorstep of epical advances in disease prevention, management, and cure wrought by genetic medicine.[18]   My urgent plea is carpe tuum tempus – seize the era in which you live.   Seize the knowledge that medical science has provided.  In a word:  Get all your vaccines and make doubly sure your children get theirs.  Do your part to Make America Sane Again.

______________________

[1] Andrew M. Wehrman, The Contagion of Liberty:  The Politics of Smallpox in the American Revolution.  Baltimore (Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, 2022), p. 220.

[2] Dan Liebowitz, “Smallpox Vaccination: An Early Start of Modern Medicine in America, ” J. Community Hosp. Intern. Med. Perspect., 7:61-63, 2017 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5463674).

[3] Jim Downs, Maladies of Empire:  How Colonialism, Slavery, and War Transformed Medicine  (Cambridge:  Harvard Univ. Press,  2021), pp. 143-145.

[4] Ibid., p. 150.

[5] James Colgrove, Epidemic City: The Politics of Public Health in New York (NY:  Russell Sage Foundation, 2011), pp. 185-187.

[6] Louis Galambos, with Jane Eliot Sewell, Networks of Innovation:  Vaccine Development at Merck, Sharp & Dohme, and Mulford, 1895-1995 (Cambridge:  Cambridge Univ. Press, 1995), pp. 106-107.

[7] Judith Sealander, The Failed Century of the Child:  Governing America’s Young in the Twentieth Century (Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2003), p. 326.

[8] Colgrove, op. cit., pp. 170, 190.

[9] Carol R. Byerly, Mosquito Warrior:  Yellow Fever, Public Health, and the Forgotten Career of General William C. Gorgas (Tuscaloosa: Univ. Alabama Press, 2024), p, 226.

[10] For elaboration, see Paul E. Stepansky, “Vaccinating Across Enemy Lines,”  Medicine, Health, & History, 16 April 2021 (https://adoseofhistory.com/2021/04/16/vaccinating-across-enemy-lines).

[12] Peter J. Hotez, “Vaccine Diplomacy:  Historical Perspective and Future Directions,” PLoS Neglected Trop. Dis. 8:e380810.1371, 2014; Peter J. Hotez, “Russian-United States Vaccine Science: Preserving the Legacy,” PLoS Neglected Trop. Dis., 11:e0005320,2017.

[13] Galombo & Sewell, op. cit., pp. 106-107.

[14] Joseph F. Kett, The Formation of the American Medical Profession:  The Role of Institutions, 1780-1860 (New Haven: Yale Univ. Press, 1968), p. vii.  I invoke the Jacksonian Dark Age of American medicine in  a different context in  Paul E. Stepansky, Psychoanalysis at the Margins (NY:  Other Press, 2009), pp. 283-285.

[15] Nadav Davidovitch, “Negotiating Dissent:  Homeopathy and Anti-Vaccinationism At the Turn of the Twentieth Century,” in Robert D. Johnston, ed., The Politics of Healing: Histories of Alternative Medicine in Twentieth-Century Medicine (New York:  Routledge, 2004), pp. 23-24.

[16] Paul E. Stepansky, “Covid-19 and Trump’s Medieval Turn of Mind,”  Medicine, Health, and History, 19 August 2020  (https://adoseofhistory.com/?s=Trump%27s+Medieval+turn)

[17]  Marilyn Marchone, “More deaths, no benefit from malaria drug in VA virus study,”  AP News, 21 April 2020 (https://apnews.com/article/malaria-donald-trump-us-news-ap-top-news-virus-outbreak-a5077c7227b8eb8b0dc23423c0bbe2b2).

[18] For a masterful introduction to the history of genetic medicine, including the discovery and applications of CRISPR gene editing, the development of RNA genetic vaccines for Covid-19, and the frontier of genetically engineered disease management, see Walter Issacson, Code Breaker:  Jennifer Doudna , Gene Editing, and the Future of the Human Race (NY:  Simon & Schuster, 2017).   No less illuminating is Doudna’s own account of her pathway to CRISPR research and evolving understanding of the therapeutic potential of CRISPR-based gene editing, Jennifer A. Doudna & Samuel H. Sternberg, A Crack in Creation:  Gene Editing and the Unthinkable Power to Control Evolution,  esp. chs. 1 & 2  (Boston:  Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2017).  Far more limited in scope but very worthwhile in illustrating contemporary genetic diagnosis and treatment is Am Amgis Ashley, The Genome Odyssey:   Medical Mysteries and the Incredible Quest to Solve Them (Milwaukee:  Porchlight, 2021).

Copyright © 2025 by Paul E. Stepansky. All rights reserved.  The author kindly requests that educators using his blog essays in their courses and seminars let him know via info[at]keynote-books.com.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Christian Healthcare for Christian Nationalists

 

Christian Nationalism (CN):   The belief that the United States is, and always has been, a Christian nation.  An oxymoron in the context of the explicit language of the Bill of Rights and the Constitution.

CN Proponents:  Titans of  American Ignorance in all its anti-historical, anti-rationalist, anti-democratic glory.  Nationalism, as set forth in the Bill of Rights and the Constitution, does not permit the qualifier, “Christian.”  The phrase is quite literally non-sensical.

America’s Founding Fathers:   A group of educated gentlemen, some avowed Christians and others deists influenced by English and French freethinkers. Whatever their personal convictions, the Founders collectively established  a secular republic predicated on religious freedom and the separation of Church and State.  The documents they bequeathed to us and that continue to shape our national sense of self – the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution – do not establish a Christian nation.[i]

_____________________

It’s August 21, 1790, and George Washington sets pen to paper and writes a letter to the Hebrew Congregation of Newport, Rhode Island.  Following the state’s ratification of the Constitution, Washington congratulates the Newport congregants for joining a nation where “every one shall sit in safety under his own vine and fig-tree and there shall be none to make him afraid.”   And he continues: “For happily the Government of the United States gives to bigotry no sanction, to persecution no assistance, requires only that they who live under its protection should demean themselves as good citizens, in giving on all occasions their effectual support.”

Now it’s  June 7, 1797, and Washington’s successor, John Adams, adds his ringing endorsement to Congress’s unanimous ratification of the Treaty of Tripoli.  All the nation’s “citizens and inhabitants thereof”  are enjoined “faithfully to observe and fulfill the said Treaty and every clause and article thereof.”   Article 11 of the Treaty begins with this avowal: “the government of the United States of America is not in any sense founded on the Christian Religion.”  The Article in its entirety mitigates in no way at all the plain meaning of this statement.

And now on New Year’s Day, 1802, Thomas Jefferson composes a letter to the Danbury Baptist Association.  Here the  third president asserts, famously, that “the legitimate powers of the government reach actions only, & not opinions.”   It followed that Jefferson contemplate[d] with “sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should ‘make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,’ thus building a wall of separation between Church & State.”[ii]

These words tell us how the first three American presidents understood the nation they helped create.  But more important than these words or any other words they wrote or spoke, is the document they and their colleagues signed in 1787 and bequeathed to future generations.  This charter of government, the Constitution of the United States, took effect on March 9, 1789 and has guided the nation these past 233 years.

____________________

Christian Nationalism, code for an un-American Christian Nation-State, seeks to overthrow the Constitution, the founding document on which the American Republic is predicated.  The prospect of a Christian Nation that consigns the values, principles, and precepts of the Constitution to the dustbin of history is the stuff of nightmares.  Many nightmares.  What follows is a gloss on one of them:  What might well follow, indeed, what ought to follow, in the domain of healthcare after the CNs come to power:

  1.  Society’s commitment to public health would be overturned by the Supreme Court.  Jehovah’s Witnesses and Christian Scientists would be entitled, as a matter of law, to deprive their children of life-saving blood transfusions and tissue and organ transplants.  If you’re a Christian Scientist parent, for example, go ahead and let your children die, as they have in the past, from untreated diabetes (leading to diabetic ketoacidosis), bacterial meningitis, and pneumonia.  What American courts define as criminal neglect would be sanctioned – as long as it resulted from one or another variety of Christian belief.  A litmus test for membership in the Christian Nation could be repudiation of compulsory childhood vaccination, with parents who deny their children vaccination on religious grounds applauded for putting their children at risk, and sometimes sacrificing them, out of adherence to their version of a Christian Life.  Similarly, during times of pandemic, Christians who, as beneficiaries of Divine protection, chose to ignore quarantine directives from leftist health organizations like the CDC and WHO would  receive the blessing of the  State.  All such groups would be following in the footsteps of many contemporary Evangelicals.  As Covid-19 gripped the nation and the world, Evangelicals from California to Florida, courageous Christians all, refused to follow social distancing and stay-at-home guidelines; they continued to assemble for communal worship in churches and homes, placing themselves and their communities in peril.[iii]
  2. America’s long and inglorious tradition of discrimination in medical education would be rejuvenated on behalf of the Christian state.  Examples of exclusion by race, religion, and gender abound, and they can be drawn on to guide Christian Nationalists in any number of discriminatory practices for marginalizing the presence of non-Christians in American healthcare.  Consider only that by the mid-1930s, over 2,000 American medical students, 95% of whom were Jews, were driven to Europe to pursue medicine.  Seven years later, Charles Drew wrote a blistering letter to the editor of JAMA, protesting the AMA’s racially based exclusion of qualified black applicants whose state chapters refused them membership, thereby keeping them out of the national organization.  The American Nursing Association (ANA) was little better.  Founded in 1896, it  allowed qualified black nurses from states with racist state chapters direct admittance to the national organization only in 1950.  The Georgia chapter, incidentally, continued to exclude blacks until 1961, and retreated only after the ANA threated to expel it from the national organization.[iv]  And let us not forget quota systems, implemented to keep Jews out of both elite universities and medical schools after World War I.  After all, they were followed by the quota system implemented in the Immigration Acts of 1921 and 1924, a device to keep East European immigrants out of the country – a project no doubt congenial to Christian Nationalists.[v]
  3. Christian Healthcare would enjoin believing Christians to follow the dictates of conscience in deploying life-saving medications, procedures, and technologies on nonbelievers. EMTs and Medics, for example, would no longer be legally or professionally obligated to provide assistance to Jews, Muslims, Hindus, atheists, and other non-Christians. This will require a Constitutional amendment, since the Constitution makes no allowance for conscience as a ground for violating laws and lawfully implemented directives, as in the denial of life-saving medical interventions.  The First Amendment provides only for freedom of religion, understood as the freedom to practice the religion of one’s choice through voluntary affiliation with one or another House of Worship (or no House of Worship at all).
  4. It follows that Christian physicians, nurses, and other providers would be free, as practicing Christians, to provide services only to Christians. They might, at their conscience-driven discretion, avoid nonbelievers entirely or simply privilege the needs (as to medications, nourishment, and allocation of scarce resources) of Christians.  Self-evidently, Christian surgeons would be under no legal, professional, or moral obligation to operate on Jews, Muslims, Hindus, atheists, and other nonbelievers; nor would Christian anesthesiologists be required to administer anesthesia to them.  Professional codes of ethics would have to be revised (i.e., Christianized) accordingly.  In toto, under the auspices of a Christian nation, there would be a vast expansion of the “refusal laws” that individual states have passed to free hospitals, physicians, and nurses from any obligation to provide patients with abortions and other reproductive services, including contraceptives, genetic counseling, infertility treatment, STD and HIV testing, and treatment of victims of sexual assault.  Constitutional amendments would be required on this score as well, since such “laws of conscience,” whatever their religious moorings, have no legal, judicial, or moral status in the Constitution.
  5. Following the example of the National Blood Program of 1941, the blood bank set up to provide Caucasian-only blood to the American armed forces, all nationally sanctioned blood banks should be limited to Christian donors.[vi]  There is ample historical precedent regarding the sacrosanctity of Christian blood and blood products; witness the Italian residents of Bolzano who, newly absorbed into  Bavaria by Napoleon in 1807, launch an armed revolt against mandatory smallpox vaccination lest Protestantism be injected into their Catholic veins. Over a century later, a Nazi military directive forbidding the transfusion of Jewish blood into the veins of German military personnel led to the death of countless war wounded.  America was little better in the collection, identification, and storage of  blood.  The Red Cross Blood Donor Program, after refusing the blood of black Americans for a year, began accepting it in January 1942.  But it continued to segregate blood by donor race until 1950; southern states like Arkansas and Louisiana held firm to segregated blood collection until the early 1970s.[vii]  These precedents will be seized on in the time of CN.  In the new America, the blood of nonbelievers could be collected by their respective agencies, and made available to hospitals and clinics amenable to receiving and storing impure blood for non-Christian patients. Institutions that continued to  permit cross-religious transfusions would require signed waivers from Christian patients willing to accept transfusions of non-Christian blood under exigent circumstances.  Such waivers could be incorporated into Living Wills.

Christian Healthcare is only one of the societal transformations that await the ascendancy of Christian Nationalism.  The anti-intellectual disemboweling of American public education, especially in the South, is already well under way; where will it end up when the white CNs assume control?  To those who espouse it, I say:  Congratulations.  You have destroyed the America envisioned by the Founding Fathers and enshrined in the Constitution and Bill of Rights.  You have replaced the wall of separation between Church and State with a wall of separation between Christian and non-Christian.  In so doing, you have laid the seedbed for one more religious theocracy, a Christian sibling to the virulently anti-democratic Muslim theocracies of the Middle East.

The American theocracy will reach its apotheosis over time.  But when the Christian Nationalists assume political control, there will be immediate changes.  The United States will all at once be a two-tier society stratified along religious lines.  It will not only be Jews who, failing to throw their votes to Christian leaders, will have to watch their backs.  Everyone who opposes Christian National hegemony will be at risk.  We will all have to, in the ex-president’s  subtle formulation, “watch it.”

What to call the new state?  Christian Nationalists may profitably analogize from the example of Saudi Arabia.  If we replace “Saudi” (i.e., the Kingdom of Saud) with the New Testament’s “Kingdom of God,” and let “New Jerusalem” stand  for it, we arrive at a suitable replacement for the United States of America.  Here, Christian Nationalists, is the nation of your dreams and our nightmares.  I give you  New Jerusamerica.

January 6, 2021

______________________

[i] I am grateful to my friend and colleague of many decades, Professor Jeffrey Merrick, for his help in formulating my comments on the Founding Fathers, religion, and the founding of the American Republic.  Among recent books elaborating in scholarly detail these comments, see especially Steven K. Green, Inventing a Christian America:  The Myth of the Religious Founding (New York:  OUP, 2015).

[ii] Washington’s and Jefferson’s letters and Adams’ remarks to Congress are in the public domain and widely reproduced on the internet.

[iii] Ed Kilgore, “Many Evangelicals are Going to Church Despite Social-Distancing Guidelines,” New York Magazine, April 17, 2020  (https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2020/04/many-evangelicals-defying-guidelines-on-in-person-gatherings.html); Bianca Lopez, “Religious Resistance to Quarantine Has a Long History,”  (https://blog.smu.edu/opinions/2020/08/07/religious-resistance-to-quarantine-has-a-long-history).  “In numerous parts of the United States,”  Lopez writes, “certain stripes of Christianity and quarantine orders stand in direct opposition, resulting in deadly outcomes due to the COVID-19 pandemic.”

[iv] Edward C. Halperin, “The Jewish Problem in Medical Education, 1920-1955,” J. Hist. Med. & Allied Sci., 56:140-167, 2001, at 157-158; Patricia D’Antonio, American Nursing: A History of Knowledge, Authority, and the Meaning of Work (Baltimore: John Hopkins, 2010), 130.

[v] David Oshinsky, Bellevue:  Three Centuries of Medicine and Mayhem at America’s Most Storied Hospital.  NY: Doubleday, 2016), 196-198; Ian Robert Dowbiggin, Keeping America Sane: Psychiatry and Eugenics in The United States and Canada, 1880-1940 (Ithaca: Cornell University Press,1997), 224-227.

[vi] Charles E. Wynes, Charles Richard Drew: The Man and The Myth (Urbana: Univ. Illinois Press, 1988), 67; “Nazi Order Prohibiting Jewish Blood for Transfusions Causing Death of Many Soldiers,” JTA Daily News Bulletin, March 2, 1942 (https://www.jta.org/archive/nazi-order-prohibiting-jewish-blood-for-transfusions-causing-death-of-many-soldiers).  Note that I am not addressing Christian sects, like Jehovah’s Witnesses, whose members refuse blood transfusions altogether, only those that accept transfusions, but only of Christian blood.

[vii] Thomas A. Guglielmo, “Desegregating Blood:  A Civil Rights Struggle to Remember,” February 4, 2018 (https://www.pbs.org/newshour/science/desegregating-blood-a-civil-rights-struggle-to-remember).  For   lengthier consideration of blood and race in American history, see Spencer Love, One Blood:  The Death and Resurrection of Charles R. Drew (Chapel Hill:  Univ. North Carolina Press, 1996), 139-160.

Copyright © 2022 by Paul E. Stepansky.  All rights reserved. The author kindly requests that educators using his blog essays in their courses and seminars let him know via info[at]keynote-books.com.